Connecticut in the Civil War

IT IS quite unnecessary to record the events which led to the war of the great Rebellion. During the interval between the election of Abraham Lincoln to the presidency, in 1860, and the bombardment of Fort Sumter, in 1861, the position of Connecticut was not equivocal. The declaration and acts of her governor, her Legislature, and her representatives in Congress, were all in favor of a firm maintenance of the national honor, and against any concession to those who sought to compromise that honor, or to humiliate the nation.

There were, however, in Connecticut, as in the other loyal States, some who, if not in sympathy with those who had seceded from the Union, were not heartily in accord with those who advocated prompt and energetic measures for the defense of the national integrity. The attack on Fort Sumter, however, aroused in many of these their dormant patriotism, and the sympathizers with the rebels were reduced to an impotent minority.

As in other parts of the loyal North, there was here a spontaneous uprising for the support of the government; and such was the enthusiasm of the people that, in four days from the first call for troops, a regiment was at its rendezvous, and within three weeks 54 companies, or five times the quota of the State under the call, had tendered their services.

Did space permit, an account of the self-sacrificing patriotism which was manifested in all parts of the State would be of interest. Different localities seemed to vie with each other in their efforts to sustain the government which had conferred on them prosperity and happiness.

As time wore on, however, and the armies of the Union encountered disasters in the field, the opponents of the war became bolder and more outspoken. In the darkest hours of that struggle, however, they were not able to obtain control of the State government, and from the beginning to the end of that terrible war, Connecticut sustained her full share of the burden which it imposed on the nation.

It is worthy of remark that on the first day of the next session of the Legislature after the return of peace, the amendment to the Federal constitution abolishing and prohibiting slavery was ratified without a dissenting vote.

The number of men furnished by the State during the war was 54,882, of whom 1,804 were in the naval service. This total, when reduced to a three years’ standard, gives 41,483, a surplus, in three years’ men, of 6,698 over the total quota required to be furnished by the State. The number of men furnished, in proportion to the population of the State, was greater than that of any other State except Iowa and Illinois. The total war expenses of the State were estimated at $6,623,580.60.

Connecticut furnished the following general officers who were natives or residents of the State, or who were officers of Connecticut regiments, and became general officers during the war:

Henry W. Benham, Darius N. Couch, Joseph R. F. Mansfield, Joseph A. Mower, Newton, John Sedgwick, Alfred H. Terry, Horatio G. Wright, major-generals; Henry L. Abbott, Henry W. Birge, Joseph R. Hawley, Alexander Shaler, Joseph G. Totten, Robert O. Tyler, Henry W. Wessells, A. S. Williams, brevet major-generals; Luther P. Bradley, Henry B. Carrington, William T. Clark, Orris S. Ferry, Edward Harland, Henry M. Judah, William S. Ketchum, Nathaniel Lyon, Ranold S. Mackenzie, James W. Ripley, Benjamin S. Roberts, Truman Seymour, A. Von Steinwehr, Daniel Tyler, H. D. Terry, brigadier-generals; Erastus Blakeslee, William G. Ely, Theodore G. Ellis, E. D. S. Goodyear, Edwin S. Greeley, James Hubbard, Brayton Ives, Edward M. Lee, Gustavus Loomis, John Loomis, William H. Noble, John L. Otis, Joseph G. Perkins, William S. Pierson, Alfred P. Rockwell, Samuel Ross, Griffin A. Stedman, John E. Toutellotte, Edward W. Whitaker, Henry M. Whittlesey, Henry C. Ward, brevet brigadier-generals.

It is a fact, of which their descendants have reason to be proud, that the founders of Connecticut comprehended the great principles of civil and religious liberty, and established the government, from the first in strict accordance with those principles. While the other colonies were suffering under the domination, and often under the tyranny of royal governors, she had her affairs administered by officers of her own choice. As has been seen she firmly and successfully resisted every attempted encroachment on her rights, and every effort, whether by insidious craft or open intimidation, to deprive her of her charter.

In this State it was not found necessary after the Declaration of Independence to adopt a constitution, but simply to enact a statute providing that the government should be administered according to the provisions of the charter, which was already republican in its character. This form of government continued without essential change till 1818.

The changes that time had gradually wrought rendered the adoption of a new fundamental law desirable, and accordingly, in that year, a convention of delegates from the several towns assembled in Hartford, and in a session of about three weeks elaborated a constitution. This was submitted to the electors of the State, in October of that year, and was ratified by a majority of fifteen hundred and four.

The following is a list of the colonial and State governors of Connecticut:

NameFirst ChosenYears Served
John Haynes16398
Edward Hopkins16407
George Willys16421
Thomas Weller16552
John Webster16581
John Winthrop165718
William Leete16767
Robert Treat16834
Sir Edmund Andross16872
Robert Treat16899
Fitz John Winthrop16989
Gurdon Saltonstall170717
Joseph Talcott172417
Jonathan Law17419
Roger Wolcott17504
Thomas Fitch175412
William Pitkin17663
Jonathan Trumbull176915
Matthew Griswold17842
Samuel Huntington178610
Oliver Wolcott17962
Jonathan Trumbull179811
John Treadwell18092
Roger Griswold18111
John Cotton Smith18134
Oliver Wolcott18189
Gideon Tomlinson18274
John Samuel Peters18312
Henry W. Edwards18331
Samuel A. Foot18341
Henry W. Edwards18353
William W. Ellsworth18384
Chauncey F. Cleveland18422
Roger Sherman Baldwin18442
Isaac Toucey18461
Clark Bissell18472
Joseph Trumbull18491
Thomas H. Seymour18504
Henry Dutton18541
William T. Minor18552
Alexander H. Holley18571
William A. Buckingham18588
Joseph R. Hawley18661
James E. English18672
Marshall Jewell18691
James E. English18701
Marshall Jewell18712
Charles R. Ingersoll18734
Richard D. Hubbard18772
Charles B. Andrews18792
Hobart B. Bigelow18812
Thomas M. Waller1883

The deputy or lieutenant governors of the colony and State of Connecticut have been:

NameFirst ChosenYears Served
Roger Ludlow16393
John Haynes16405
George Willys16411
Edward Hopkins16436
Thomas Weller16544
John Webster16581
John Winthrop16591
John Mason16609
William Leete16697
Robert Treat167617
James Bishop16837
William Jones16925
Nathan Gold170816
Joseph Talcott1724
Jonathan Law172417
Roger Wolcott17419
Thomas Fitch17504
William Pitkin175412
Jonathan Trumbull17663
Matthew Griswold176915
Samuel Huntington17842
Oliver Wolcott178610
Jonathan Trumbull17962
John Treadwell179811
Roger Griswold18092
John Cotton Smith18112
Chauncey Goodrich18132
Jonathan Ingersoll18167
David Plant18234
John S. Peters18274
Henry W. Edwards18311
Thaddeus Betts18321
Ebenezer Stoddard18331
Thaddeus Betts18341
Ebenezer Stoddard18353
Charles Hawley18384
William S. Holabird18422
Reuben Booth18442
Noyes Billings18461
Charles J. McCurdy18472
Thomas Backus18491
Charles H. Pond18501
Green Kendrick18511
Charles H. Pond18521
Alexander H. Holley18542
William Field18551
Albert Day18561
Alfred A. Burnham18571
Julius Catlin18583
Benjamin Douglas18611
Roger Averill18624
Oliver F. Winchester18661
Ephraim H. Hyde18672
Francis Wayland18691
Julius Hotchkiss18701
Morris Tyler18712
George G. Sill18734
Francis B. Loomis18772
David Gallup18792
William H. Bulkeley18812
George G. Sumner1883

Source

Whittemore, Henry, History of Middlesex county, Connecticut, with biographical sketches of its prominent men, New York : J. B. Beers & Co., 1884.


Discover more from Connecticut Genealogy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.