IT IS quite unnecessary to record the events which led to the war of the great Rebellion. During the interval between the election of Abraham Lincoln to the presidency, in 1860, and the bombardment of Fort Sumter, in 1861, the position of Connecticut was not equivocal. The declaration and acts of her governor, her Legislature, and her representatives in Congress, were all in favor of a firm maintenance of the national honor, and against any concession to those who sought to compromise that honor, or to humiliate the nation.
There were, however, in Connecticut, as in the other loyal States, some who, if not in sympathy with those who had seceded from the Union, were not heartily in accord with those who advocated prompt and energetic measures for the defense of the national integrity. The attack on Fort Sumter, however, aroused in many of these their dormant patriotism, and the sympathizers with the rebels were reduced to an impotent minority.
As in other parts of the loyal North, there was here a spontaneous uprising for the support of the government; and such was the enthusiasm of the people that, in four days from the first call for troops, a regiment was at its rendezvous, and within three weeks 54 companies, or five times the quota of the State under the call, had tendered their services.
Did space permit, an account of the self-sacrificing patriotism which was manifested in all parts of the State would be of interest. Different localities seemed to vie with each other in their efforts to sustain the government which had conferred on them prosperity and happiness.
As time wore on, however, and the armies of the Union encountered disasters in the field, the opponents of the war became bolder and more outspoken. In the darkest hours of that struggle, however, they were not able to obtain control of the State government, and from the beginning to the end of that terrible war, Connecticut sustained her full share of the burden which it imposed on the nation.
It is worthy of remark that on the first day of the next session of the Legislature after the return of peace, the amendment to the Federal constitution abolishing and prohibiting slavery was ratified without a dissenting vote.
The number of men furnished by the State during the war was 54,882, of whom 1,804 were in the naval service. This total, when reduced to a three years’ standard, gives 41,483, a surplus, in three years’ men, of 6,698 over the total quota required to be furnished by the State. The number of men furnished, in proportion to the population of the State, was greater than that of any other State except Iowa and Illinois. The total war expenses of the State were estimated at $6,623,580.60.
Connecticut furnished the following general officers who were natives or residents of the State, or who were officers of Connecticut regiments, and became general officers during the war:
Henry W. Benham, Darius N. Couch, Joseph R. F. Mansfield, Joseph A. Mower, Newton, John Sedgwick, Alfred H. Terry, Horatio G. Wright, major-generals; Henry L. Abbott, Henry W. Birge, Joseph R. Hawley, Alexander Shaler, Joseph G. Totten, Robert O. Tyler, Henry W. Wessells, A. S. Williams, brevet major-generals; Luther P. Bradley, Henry B. Carrington, William T. Clark, Orris S. Ferry, Edward Harland, Henry M. Judah, William S. Ketchum, Nathaniel Lyon, Ranold S. Mackenzie, James W. Ripley, Benjamin S. Roberts, Truman Seymour, A. Von Steinwehr, Daniel Tyler, H. D. Terry, brigadier-generals; Erastus Blakeslee, William G. Ely, Theodore G. Ellis, E. D. S. Goodyear, Edwin S. Greeley, James Hubbard, Brayton Ives, Edward M. Lee, Gustavus Loomis, John Loomis, William H. Noble, John L. Otis, Joseph G. Perkins, William S. Pierson, Alfred P. Rockwell, Samuel Ross, Griffin A. Stedman, John E. Toutellotte, Edward W. Whitaker, Henry M. Whittlesey, Henry C. Ward, brevet brigadier-generals.
It is a fact, of which their descendants have reason to be proud, that the founders of Connecticut comprehended the great principles of civil and religious liberty, and established the government, from the first in strict accordance with those principles. While the other colonies were suffering under the domination, and often under the tyranny of royal governors, she had her affairs administered by officers of her own choice. As has been seen she firmly and successfully resisted every attempted encroachment on her rights, and every effort, whether by insidious craft or open intimidation, to deprive her of her charter.
In this State it was not found necessary after the Declaration of Independence to adopt a constitution, but simply to enact a statute providing that the government should be administered according to the provisions of the charter, which was already republican in its character. This form of government continued without essential change till 1818.
The changes that time had gradually wrought rendered the adoption of a new fundamental law desirable, and accordingly, in that year, a convention of delegates from the several towns assembled in Hartford, and in a session of about three weeks elaborated a constitution. This was submitted to the electors of the State, in October of that year, and was ratified by a majority of fifteen hundred and four.
The following is a list of the colonial and State governors of Connecticut:
Name | First Chosen | Years Served |
---|---|---|
John Haynes | 1639 | 8 |
Edward Hopkins | 1640 | 7 |
George Willys | 1642 | 1 |
Thomas Weller | 1655 | 2 |
John Webster | 1658 | 1 |
John Winthrop | 1657 | 18 |
William Leete | 1676 | 7 |
Robert Treat | 1683 | 4 |
Sir Edmund Andross | 1687 | 2 |
Robert Treat | 1689 | 9 |
Fitz John Winthrop | 1698 | 9 |
Gurdon Saltonstall | 1707 | 17 |
Joseph Talcott | 1724 | 17 |
Jonathan Law | 1741 | 9 |
Roger Wolcott | 1750 | 4 |
Thomas Fitch | 1754 | 12 |
William Pitkin | 1766 | 3 |
Jonathan Trumbull | 1769 | 15 |
Matthew Griswold | 1784 | 2 |
Samuel Huntington | 1786 | 10 |
Oliver Wolcott | 1796 | 2 |
Jonathan Trumbull | 1798 | 11 |
John Treadwell | 1809 | 2 |
Roger Griswold | 1811 | 1 |
John Cotton Smith | 1813 | 4 |
Oliver Wolcott | 1818 | 9 |
Gideon Tomlinson | 1827 | 4 |
John Samuel Peters | 1831 | 2 |
Henry W. Edwards | 1833 | 1 |
Samuel A. Foot | 1834 | 1 |
Henry W. Edwards | 1835 | 3 |
William W. Ellsworth | 1838 | 4 |
Chauncey F. Cleveland | 1842 | 2 |
Roger Sherman Baldwin | 1844 | 2 |
Isaac Toucey | 1846 | 1 |
Clark Bissell | 1847 | 2 |
Joseph Trumbull | 1849 | 1 |
Thomas H. Seymour | 1850 | 4 |
Henry Dutton | 1854 | 1 |
William T. Minor | 1855 | 2 |
Alexander H. Holley | 1857 | 1 |
William A. Buckingham | 1858 | 8 |
Joseph R. Hawley | 1866 | 1 |
James E. English | 1867 | 2 |
Marshall Jewell | 1869 | 1 |
James E. English | 1870 | 1 |
Marshall Jewell | 1871 | 2 |
Charles R. Ingersoll | 1873 | 4 |
Richard D. Hubbard | 1877 | 2 |
Charles B. Andrews | 1879 | 2 |
Hobart B. Bigelow | 1881 | 2 |
Thomas M. Waller | 1883 | – |
The deputy or lieutenant governors of the colony and State of Connecticut have been:
Name | First Chosen | Years Served |
---|---|---|
Roger Ludlow | 1639 | 3 |
John Haynes | 1640 | 5 |
George Willys | 1641 | 1 |
Edward Hopkins | 1643 | 6 |
Thomas Weller | 1654 | 4 |
John Webster | 1658 | 1 |
John Winthrop | 1659 | 1 |
John Mason | 1660 | 9 |
William Leete | 1669 | 7 |
Robert Treat | 1676 | 17 |
James Bishop | 1683 | 7 |
William Jones | 1692 | 5 |
Nathan Gold | 1708 | 16 |
Joseph Talcott | 1724 | – |
Jonathan Law | 1724 | 17 |
Roger Wolcott | 1741 | 9 |
Thomas Fitch | 1750 | 4 |
William Pitkin | 1754 | 12 |
Jonathan Trumbull | 1766 | 3 |
Matthew Griswold | 1769 | 15 |
Samuel Huntington | 1784 | 2 |
Oliver Wolcott | 1786 | 10 |
Jonathan Trumbull | 1796 | 2 |
John Treadwell | 1798 | 11 |
Roger Griswold | 1809 | 2 |
John Cotton Smith | 1811 | 2 |
Chauncey Goodrich | 1813 | 2 |
Jonathan Ingersoll | 1816 | 7 |
David Plant | 1823 | 4 |
John S. Peters | 1827 | 4 |
Henry W. Edwards | 1831 | 1 |
Thaddeus Betts | 1832 | 1 |
Ebenezer Stoddard | 1833 | 1 |
Thaddeus Betts | 1834 | 1 |
Ebenezer Stoddard | 1835 | 3 |
Charles Hawley | 1838 | 4 |
William S. Holabird | 1842 | 2 |
Reuben Booth | 1844 | 2 |
Noyes Billings | 1846 | 1 |
Charles J. McCurdy | 1847 | 2 |
Thomas Backus | 1849 | 1 |
Charles H. Pond | 1850 | 1 |
Green Kendrick | 1851 | 1 |
Charles H. Pond | 1852 | 1 |
Alexander H. Holley | 1854 | 2 |
William Field | 1855 | 1 |
Albert Day | 1856 | 1 |
Alfred A. Burnham | 1857 | 1 |
Julius Catlin | 1858 | 3 |
Benjamin Douglas | 1861 | 1 |
Roger Averill | 1862 | 4 |
Oliver F. Winchester | 1866 | 1 |
Ephraim H. Hyde | 1867 | 2 |
Francis Wayland | 1869 | 1 |
Julius Hotchkiss | 1870 | 1 |
Morris Tyler | 1871 | 2 |
George G. Sill | 1873 | 4 |
Francis B. Loomis | 1877 | 2 |
David Gallup | 1879 | 2 |
William H. Bulkeley | 1881 | 2 |
George G. Sumner | 1883 | – |
Source
Whittemore, Henry, History of Middlesex county, Connecticut, with biographical sketches of its prominent men, New York : J. B. Beers & Co., 1884.
Discover more from Connecticut Genealogy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.